Sunday, 7 August 2016

Circularity In The Corridors Of Time

Copied from here.

We appreciate the ingenuity of circular causality paradoxes in time travel fiction but usually forget the details. Here, I summarise the paradoxes in a 1965 novel by Poul Anderson. I have omitted some details because they do not bear directly on the paradoxes.

Rival regimes called "Wardens" and "Rangers" from two thousand years in our future wage war through time and are the real cause behind historical conflicts like Catholics and Protestants or Cavaliers and Roundheads. They cannot change their past but hope, by manipulating social trends and subtly altering the balance of forces, to influence their future from which they are barred by their successors.

The Warden, Storm, tries to lead an attack into the Ranger homeland by driving a new time corridor through from the twentieth century. However, the Ranger, Brann, already informed about the new corridor, leads a counterattack down the corridor. Storm escapes alone and hires a twentieth century man, Lockridge, to accompany her to 1827 BC and the Danish village of Avildaro where they can await a ship to Iberia and thence to the Warden base in Crete. When an Aryan war party approaches Avildaro, Lockridge persuades Storm to stay and defend the village with futuristic weapons. He and she become prisoners of Brann who leads the war party with superior weapons and captures the village.

Brann predicts that Lockridge will change sides because it was he who had informed Brann of the new corridor and the flight to Avildaro. Lockridge escapes and brings Wardens who capture Brann and free Storm. Lockridge must then travel to the era of Wardens and Rangers and pretend to defect to the Rangers in order to tell Brann about the new corridor and Avildaro. Threatened with painful interrogation to confirm his story, he escapes and returns to Avildaro where Storm plans to build a Warden base in Stone Age Northern Europe by supervising the intermarriage of Sea People, from villages like Avildaro, with the Aryans.

Lockridge cooperates despite the unhappiness of his friends among the Sea People. Wardens Storm and Hu fly on gravity belts to investigate a large fleet approaching from England. In their absence, Lockridge finds that Brann is still alive but being painfully interrogated by the Wardens. On their return, he confronts them and is held under guard but he and a group of villagers escape when the English fleet attacks. Before leaving, Lockridge frees Brann from the interrogation machine so that he will die quickly. Lockridge leads his people to England twenty five years earlier, builds a progressive federation that he already knew of and leads the fleet that attacks Avildaro. Lockridge's wife from Avildaro, who returns with him, sees their younger selves fleeing from the village. Storm, captured, is bound and confined in the house from which she had ruled where she is strangled by the dying Brann who has just been freed by the younger Lockridge. Lockridge's confederation builds Stonehenge of which, of course, Lockridge had known in the twentieth century.

Comments

How easy is it to "escape" when held captive? Lockridge does it three times. The third time makes sense because his captors are under attack. If he had not escaped from Brann in Avildaro, then Brann would not have known to attack Avildaro. If Lockridge had not escaped from the Rangers in their own era, then their "psychic probe" would have extracted the truth from him. In that case, the Brann who had counterattacked in the time corridor and who had captured Avildaro would have known that he was to be captured and would have ordered other Rangers to recapture Avildaro as soon as Lockridge had departed for the Wardens' and Rangers' era.

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

Through Time With Mark Twain, HG Wells And Their Successors...

...mainly including Poul Anderson, of course.

The anonymous "Missing One's Coach" presents a visit to a historical period that might be a dream.

Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee experiences instantaneous "transposition of epochs" to Arthurian Britain and returns to the nineteenth century by Merlinian suspended animation.

In The Time Machine by HG Wells, the Time Traveler and his dinner guests discuss "time travelling" before the Time Traveler demonstrates his model Time Machine which does not move anywhere but, remaining stationary on the Earth's surface, undergoes extreme time dilation in either temporal direction while also unaccountably becoming both invisible and intangible.

In "The Dark Tower" by CS Lewis, five men discuss "time travelling" and agree that it is impossible before one of their number demonstrates his chronoscope which displays scenes not, as they initially think, from the past or future but from an alternative timeline.

In the Time Patrol series by Poul Anderson, timecycles, resembling modenized Time Machines, instantaneously change their spatiotemporal coordinates, thus neither moving nor dilating but disappearing and appearing.

In The Corridors Of Time by Poul Anderson, "time travelers" really do travel through time because they walk or drive down corridors whose lengths extend along the temporal axis.

In The Dancer From Atlantis by Anderson, a space-time vehicle does not remain stationary on the Earth's surface but moves across it "...while traveling through time." (London, 1977, p. 32)

In There Will Be Time by Anderson, some mutants can "time travel"/dilate invisibly and intangibly without needing a time machine and one of their number gives Wells the time travel idea.

In The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger, mutant time travel is instantaneous but involuntary.

In Bid Time Return by Richard Matheson and two Time novels by Jack Finney, travel to the past and back to the present is a learned skill.

In "The Flight of the Horse" by Larry Niven, time travel is scientifically impossible so it takes explorers into a fantasy past where they find not extinct species but mythical beasts.

This is not and cannot be a complete list of time travel fictions but it does cover most of the possibilities and presents a conceptual sequence:

time travel is possible with machines - but there are different kinds of machines;
time travel is possible without machines - but in different circumstances;
time travel is impossible but time viewing is possible with a machine;
time travel is impossible so it is fantasy, not sf.

Friday, 25 September 2015

Over On The Poul Anderson Appreciation Blog

Recent discussion of time travel has been on the Poul Anderson Appreciation blog, e.g., here. Please look there for posts that would have been published here if they had not been mainly about works by Anderson.

See also here.

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

Dear Tomorrow

I mentioned this anthology here.

In "Dear Tomorrow" by Simon Clark, the presenters of a regular live TV show plan to broadcast from the top of a mountain, asking any time travelers who find the archived show to travel back to this date and join them on the mountain. Heavy rain prevents the broadcast. The main event in the story is that a widower and a widow who had participated in the show because of their respective bereavements start to get together and move on, leaving the past behind, into tomorrow. The story hints that one person present is in fact a time traveler but I think that this was unnecessary.

If any time travelers see the archived show, then they will also see whether they appear on the show. If they do not (see themselves) appear, then they will not (travel back to) appear.

Monday, 11 August 2014

Check Out Poul Anderson

I have recently discussed time travel a lot on the Poul Anderson Appreciation blog. See here.

And here.


Saturday, 26 July 2014

Temporal Vehicles

(i) A "time machine" (antiquated terminology from HG Wells) moves fictitious characters pastwards or futurewards along a single timeline. A variation is a space-time machine, like Poul Anderson's Time Patrol timecycles or Doctor Who's Tardis, which can also move the characters to a different place.

(ii) A different kind of vehicle, with no agreed terminology, would move characters sideways into a different timeline, assuming that other timelines exist.

So how can a character with a mere time machine get into a different timeline? He might travel pastwards and (a) initiate a divergent timeline or (b) return futurewards, passing through the moment at which another time traveler had initiated a divergent timeline.

It follows that a time traveler cannot enter another timeline merely by traveling pastwards.

Friday, 6 June 2014

Stepsons Of Terra by Robert Silverberg

I had two bad experiences with time travel fiction recently, a film and a novel.

While on holiday, I borrowed, but did not finish reading, Stepsons Of Terra by Robert Silverberg.

(i) The characters refer to the "Absolute Past." Every moment is past to some moments but present to itself and future to others so there is no Absolute Past. The relativity of simultaneity means that event A can be simultaneous with event B to one observer but before or after B to another.

(ii) We are told that a building is safely invisible and undetectable because it is three microseconds in the past. It does not make sense to say that anything is now in the past. Even if it were somehow valid to say at 1.00 pm, "The building is now at 1.00 pm minus three microseconds," then, at 1.00 pm plus three microseconds, it would be necessary to say, "The building is now at 1.00 pm," so the building should be detectable at 1.00 pm.

(iii) Ewing is being tortured and is going to be killed but is rescued by an armed, masked man who returns him to his hotel room where he sleeps and recovers. On waking, he meets a group who have time travel. With their help, he travels a few days into the past to become his own armed, masked rescuer. After leaving his younger self asleep in the hotel room, Ewing continues to exist so he should still be in existence when his younger self has traveled into the past. This entails, on the simplest hypothesis, that there is a single timeline containing a single Ewing whose single world-line has a single loop.

However, Ewing concocts a much more elaborate scenario. He thinks that the Ewing whom he rescued is not only younger but also other and that this other Ewing will rescue yet another Ewing. The implications, not spelled out at least in the part of the novel that I read, are:

there is a succession of timelines;
pastward time travel is to the past not of the current timeline but of a succeeding timeline;
each Ewing is born, grows up and is eventually tortured in one timeline but is rescued by the Ewing from the preceding timeline and rescues the Ewing of the succeeding timeline.

Ewing feels obliged to end this regression. To do this, he leaves a written message beside his sleeping self advising that self not to travel into the past, then kills himself! This will ensure that the current timeline will continue to be inhabited by the Ewing who was born in it. It also ensures that, if there is a succeeding timeline, then it will be one in which Ewing is tortured and killed. Why the Ewing who kills himself regards this as a desirable outcome is beyond me.

Before dying, the Ewing who commits suicide reflects that the single factor for which he has made no provision is his own rescuer. That rescuer should have lived out the rest of his life in the preceding timeline. Either there has been an infinity of previous timelines or there has not. If not, then the Ewing of the first timeline could not have been rescued by a Ewing from any previous timeline so the progression could not have got started.